These recordings earn income through different media, such as public broadcast, television use, broadcast and consumption, sampling, commercials, and film. What is a master? They are the final and original versions of the songs of a singer or group. As far as is known, the singer-songwriter tried to buy the rights to her masters on several occasions, but was unsuccessful. In Swift's case, she signed with BMLG at age 15, and her contract ended in the fall of 2018, and she subsequently decided to work with Republic Records.
The singer also reported that Braun sold the rights to her records without her knowledge to a private equity company called Shamrock Holdings, leaving her with no opportunity to buy back her music. They did nothing to create the relationship that I have with my fans. None of these men participated in the writing of those songs. I feel very strongly that sharing what is happening to me could change the level of consciousness of other artists and potentially help them avoid a similar fate. Scott Borchetta told my team that they will allow me to use my music only if I do these things: If I agree not to re-record copycat versions of my songs next year (which is something I am legally allowed to do and look forward to) and that I had to stop talking about him and Scooter Braun. Within what Swift wrote on social networks at that time we find the following words: Later, Swift would add another post in which he explained that both Borchetta and Braun had forbidden her to use their music at the American Music Awards (AMA) 2019, a program in which she would be honored with the Artist of the Decade award, and where she had planned to make a great mix with some of her greatest hits, as well, announced to his fans that Netflix was preparing a documentary and that executives rejected the use of his old music in the project.įinally, BMLG issued a statement in which it released its version of events, ensuring that Taylor could perform at the AMAs. In the publications, the singer expressed her dissatisfaction with the sale of her material to Ithaca Holdings, a Scooter Braun company, whom she accused of having harassed or bullied her on several occasions. However, in June 2019, Swift made public, through social networks, a dispute that he was living with Scott Borchetta, founder of Big Machine Label Group (BMLG), a company that owned the copyright of the masters of his first six studio albums.
These shares so far were worth around $ 850 million.
The singer established as a condition of her contract that if UMG sells its shares in Spotify, the company will distribute part of the money from that sale to all the artists it represents, under a non-recoverable scheme. (Here it is important to note that many of our favorite singers or groups do not have their masters ). This means that the artist has more control over where her music is used and makes the most of the profits. Taylor Swift would be the owner of all his master recordings or masters made under the contract with Republic Records. The important thing here is that Swift stipulated some clauses in her contract that caught the attention of the media: In 2018 the singer partnered with Republic Records of Universal Music Group (UMG) leaving behind her partner from the Big Machine Records label. Why is Taylor Swift re-recording her old albums? In reality, the artist only wants to regain commercial exploitation rights to her first six albums ( Taylor Swift, Fearless, Speak Now, RED, 1989, and Reputation ).Īnd what does this have to do with us? Much, the history of this pop legend, reminds us that we must pay special attention to different aspects related to our business partners, the importance of registering our creations and even ideas on our behalf, marketing management, and even showing resilience in the battles. Contrary to what many think and perhaps few know, NO, it is not that Swift has not forgotten her exes and wants to return with songs "from the vault" (from the trunk) or to sing them again how much that breakup hurt.